Leadership Development: The Shooting at Fish Technique : Off Stage
ar. 19, 2012 - Leadership Development: The Shooting at Fish Technique
A long time ago I was president of an organization that prided itself on diversity and on membership participation in all decisions. That sounds like a laudable goal: however, ‘diversity” and ‘agreement’ do not work well together even in the best of times. In this particular case my job as president was to steer the group to a decision about a new facility. At the end of my leadership term we were housed in a different building, but I was totally exhausted. I had no more energy to give.
That was 20 years ago and while I’ve retained membership in the group, my profile has been lower than an earthworm’s. Until last week.
“Won’t you serve on the Leadership Development committee?” they asked. “All you have to do is find candidates who will run for the offices of president and treasurer.”
Why, I thought, would you have a nominating committee called ‘Leadership Development’? If the job of the committee was just to find unwitting volunteers, why the development component of the title? Intrigued, I went to the first meeting.
It was as I thought. A nominating committee by any other name is still a nominating committee. I’ve always hated them: committee members sit around pulling names out of a hat and then selecting candidates through the use of low level, uninformed gossip. “Well, she is certainly good about keeping minutes, even if she never says a word during the meeting. She’d be ok as President.”
“Yes, but I heard her husband has a broken leg. She might be very busy taking care of him and the children.”
“That’s true. Let’s think about somebody else.”
The second part of the Nominating Committee’s work is, of course, to strong arm the unfortunate candidate into accepting. “The Committee thinks you’re the perfect person for the job. You’ve never had a leadership role before, and it’s time you gave back. Besides, it’s only for one year.” (Common persuasive tactics, with heavy emphasis on guilt.)
In some organizations, the bylaws require two candidates for every open position. It was that way in our state Realtor association for years. The unspoken nominating committee dialogue went something like: “Well, we’ve got our candidate. Now we need to get somebody to run against him—somebody disposable, because that person probably won’t win, and will be so discouraged he’ll never be heard from again.”
So what’s the answer? In the case of the Leadership Development Committee on which I agreed to serve, the answer got a little complicated and the job became more than a candidate selection process limited to a single meeting (I am sure they are sorry they asked me to serve….). To my mind following actions are necessary to solve a leadership black hole in any organization:
1.Write clear and complete job descriptions for each office (elected and appointed). Specify the amount of time the successful candidate will be required to donate to the group.
2. Then describe the competencies the ideal candidate should have. If the job as president requires a public persona, then include that in the skill set needed for the job. (As an aside, the association for which I worked once considered a candidate who left every membership meeting with her pockets stuffed full of food—rolls, butter, anything moveable and edible. Not a desirable presidential image for a professional trade organization.)
3.Insist on a president-elect position with automatic succession. The president will assume the leadership role with a year of experience and understanding, and the board and staff will be familiar with the president’s style, values, and issues. Also, have a clear set of operational policies which transcend leadership change, and a strategic plan with which everyone is familiar.
4.Make sure candidates for leadership positions know the roles and expectations BEFORE they accept the position. I’ve known organizations that ask the candidate to sign a letter of understanding which articulates the expected duties and behaviors—a kind of pre-nup for elected leaders.
5.Create a climate of leadership management throughout the organization. This last item is extremely important and is most often neglected by organizations. Leadership skills are not delivered to a select few who stand on the mountaintops and receive stone tablets: leadership skills are teachable and applicable to all members at all levels of the organization. And these skills are not handed down in a half-day ‘leadership retreat’, either—they are the result of a consistent program of training and awareness within the organization.
Here are some ideas for establishing a leadership training program:
1.Have a budget for Leadership Development. The organization needs to put some financial resources into leadership sustainability. In one association, the Leadership Development budget includes not only education programs and a leadership retreat, but also travel to state and national meetings by elected officers. It’s important to call this item “Leadership Development”, by the way—that title indicates the priorities of the organization extend beyond martinis in the bar at the end of the day.
2.Set up a clear and consistent leadership training program for all members. Most organizations want members to represent them in the community at large as well as within the organization. They want members to help effect change, carry the association’s mission to the public, and enhance the group’s image. Leadership training not only brings a skillset to the internal leadership of the group, it gives members the training and confidence to become community leaders as well. Be the leadership hub for all of your members in their various roles.
3.Hold regular leadership trainings on how to run a meeting, how to read financial statements, how to use technology, how to manage volunteers. Many of these skills are common to all leadership roles—you may develop training partners such as the Chamber of Commerce, a local non-profit network, or the community college in your area.
4.Make it a practice to separate leadership training from group issues and politics. Many organizations hold leadership training sessions which are puffy presentations about membership benefits or current challenges within the group. That’s part of leadership training, of course, but only a small part. Groups are often held back because leaders don’t know how to place a Skype conference call, set up an email list, or use Google groups.
The take-away lesson is this: An organization will advance its mission by concentrating on two things—minimizing the changeover between one leader and another, and developing a membership base of skilled and confident leadershipcraftsmen.
Sure beats the heck out of the leadership development technique used by many nominating committees—called ‘shooting fish in a barrel.’





